AAR has signed on to the ACLS statement issued on June 9, 2026, “strongly opposing the Office of Management and Budget’s proposal for new criteria and process for federal funding for scientific research.”
You can read the statment here and see other signatories. The text of the statement is also pasted below.
ACLS Statement on OMB Proposal for New Criteria and Process for Federal Science Research Grants
Published: June 9, 2026
The American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) stands in solidarity with members of the science community in strongly opposing the Office of Management and Budget’s proposal for new criteria and process for federal funding for scientific research.
What the administration is trying to present as an effort to eliminate waste and fraud is another attack on the production and dissemination of knowledge that puts our communities, our nation, and our planet at risk.
For more than 80 years, federal research funds have been vital to accelerating advancements that have changed the world, from the Salk polio vaccine in the 1950s, to leaps in computer technology in the 1960s, the transformation of HIV from a fatal diagnosis into a manageable chronic condition in the 1990s, and the groundbreaking Human Genome Project in the early- and mid-2000s – to name just a few.
In every instance, peer review has been a cornerstone of the research, ensuring quality control through independent analysis. The new rules place peer review below political ideology in making funding decisions and gives politicians the power to cut projects regardless of their merit.
The proposed restrictions on international exchange via support for H1B visa researchers, including those from China, send a direct message to our research communities that the development of new scientific knowledge is not a priority of this administration. These students, teachers, scientists, and researchers are vital to US colleges and universities. When they stop coming to the United States, our ability to move quickly in the face of crisis will be diminished and our leadership in science, technology, and public health will be severely weakened.
Let us be clear: research must not be under the thumb of politicians.
ACLS recently won a lawsuit against the National Endowment for the Humanities to restore illegally terminated federal funding for research and public programming in the humanities and social sciences on the grounds that political litmus tests cannot displace peer review. The bottom line, according to the federal judge ruling in our case: viewpoint discrimination directly violates the First Amendment of the Constitution. Precisely because we are committed to the OMB’s stated goals of “transparency, accountability, and proper oversight,” we oppose these new rules.
We encourage our community members to stand in solidarity with our colleagues in the sciences by submitting public comments on the OMB’s proposed Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance by July 13, 2026. We also encourage our community and supporters to add comments to the Stand Up for Science advocacy page as a show of support.